<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GregNews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gregnews.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gregnews.com</link>
	<description>Greg Reports, Greg Decides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Zimmerman case developments.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/new-zimmerman-case-developments/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/new-zimmerman-case-developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m no lawyer, have no legal training. But I think when you have a highly controversial and terribly politicized case such as the State of Florida versus George Zimmerman either legal team is best served by giving the jury a choice or set of options that they will be able to live with. When State [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/new-zimmerman-case-developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush secret prisons bad, Obama secret prisons okay.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/bush-secret-prisons-bad-obama-secret-prisons-okay/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/bush-secret-prisons-bad-obama-secret-prisons-okay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[int]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Thiessen has a list of great questions regarding the Washington Post story about secret CIA prisons. Here&#8217;s one: 1. The Obama administration has been openly critical of the Bush administration for its “secret detention” of captured terrorists. Now it turns out the Obama administration been conducting the “secret release” of captured terrorists. How long [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/bush-secret-prisons-bad-obama-secret-prisons-okay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Justice&#8217;s not-so inalienable rights.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/social-justices-not-so-inalienable-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/social-justices-not-so-inalienable-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illiberal democracies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff from Jonah Goldberg&#8217;s new book, The Tyranny of Cliches. The fundamental problem with social justice is that there are no limiting principles to it. It is an open-ended license for the forces of goodness to do what they think is right forever. &#8230; November 2007, the UN General Assembly declared that starting in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/social-justices-not-so-inalienable-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals against liberty.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/liberals-against-liberty/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/liberals-against-liberty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Will comments below on the attempt by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) to re-define freedom of speech and fundamentally alter the First Amendment. You can&#8217;t make this stuff up. It stinks of your typical edicts from fascist, socialist, dictatorial states, and is wrapped in Orwellian language of &#8220;People&#8217;s Rights.&#8221; People, unless you&#8217;re assembling in a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/liberals-against-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dangers of bureaucracies, continued.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/the-dangers-of-bureaucracies-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/the-dangers-of-bureaucracies-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coincidental to previous posts quoting our founder&#8217;s emphasizing Separation of Powers, I found this interesting text in Jonah Goldberg&#8217;s latest book, The Tyranny of Cliches: With the arguable exception of the Civil War (and, of course, the institution of slavery), the lowest point in American civil liberties wasn’t during the Bush years, or the Nixon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/the-dangers-of-bureaucracies-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madison foreshadowed dangers of unchecked power.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/madison-foreshadowed-dangers-of-unchecked-power/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/madison-foreshadowed-dangers-of-unchecked-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding principles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others. The provision for defense must in this, as in all other cases, be made commensurate to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/madison-foreshadowed-dangers-of-unchecked-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi only lies when her lips move.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/pelosi-only-lies-when-her-lips-move/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/pelosi-only-lies-when-her-lips-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose at least it made it to the WaPost opinion page, but it&#8217;s an indictment of our mainstream media that they simply refuse to ask Nancy Pelosi any hard questions regarding accusations that she flat-out lied to the American public regarding what she knew about enhanced interrogation, when she knew it, and what she [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/pelosi-only-lies-when-her-lips-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rodriguez to 60-Minutes: You don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/rodriguez-to-60-minutes-you-dont-know-what-youre-talking-about/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/rodriguez-to-60-minutes-you-dont-know-what-youre-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former CIA chief, Jose Rodriguez, lays the intellectual wood down on 60-Minutes&#8217; Leslie Stahl. I love his point, which many others have noted before, that for some reason the mainstream media and many politicos curiously believe that the morally superior position is to kill terrorists rather than capture them and subject them to enhanced interrogation. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/05/rodriguez-to-60-minutes-you-dont-know-what-youre-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffett: Tax breaks for me, not for thee.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/04/buffett-tax-breaks-for-me-not-for-thee/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/04/buffett-tax-breaks-for-me-not-for-thee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This report is another typical example of the guilty conscience of a wealthy liberal. Having made their bones by legally playing the tax code we have they now seek to relieve their guilt and hand-wringing angst by championing the removal of those very loopholes &#8212; but, naturally, not before exercising it one more time. [WSJ] [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/04/buffett-tax-breaks-for-me-not-for-thee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxes for today&#8217;s &#8220;rich&#8221; hit tomorrow&#8217;s middle class.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/04/taxes-for-todays-rich-hit-tomorrows-middle-class/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/04/taxes-for-todays-rich-hit-tomorrows-middle-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gregnews.com/?p=2601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the President of Americans for Tax Reform Grover Norquist: During the 2011 debate on combining tax hikes and spending to reduce the deficit by $2.5 trillion, Scott Rasmussen&#8217;s polling found that 75% of Americans were convinced that any deal in Congress would actually increase taxes on the middle class. Even with the president promising [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gregnews.com/2012/04/taxes-for-todays-rich-hit-tomorrows-middle-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

